But the $125 is only the start. If your identity was stolen, or other issues occurred with your credit, you can claim the time it takes to repair your credit. Although, you may want to hire a lawyer or accountant to help you work out the costs. But you may even qualify for much more than $125…
Possibly tens of thousands of dollars.
This is all dependent on the amount of time it has taken you to repair your credit, and of course if your identity or credit issues are a result of the Equifax Data Breach.
If your credit is something you are worried about, you may opt for the credit monitoring option over financial compensation. This may be a good idea, as your identity was possibly compromised by the data breach.
The Bottom Line on Equifax Data Breach Compensation
In 2017, it was uncovered that: the financial information of 147 million Americans was compromised. If your information was leaked, you may qualify for compensation. You may qualify for much more from the data breach via the class action lawsuit brought against Equifax if your information leak resulted in- identity theft or similar issues.
To see if your information was compromised you can checkhere. If you have any questions, you may want to consult your attorney or accountant.
What is legally safe drinking water? What contaminants are permitted to be in drinking water and how much. Lets look into the EPA’s standards for legally safe drinking water and see what makes water legally safe fro drinking.
The history of traffic laws stretches back to 1901, when cars began to be more popular. Since then, we have continued to expand the regulations of drivers on the road. Here is the history of driving laws from 1901-1960.
Here’s the deal: they have some questions for you.
But, you only have one question…
Is it illegal to not answer your front door if a police officer knocks?
Let’s find out!
Do I have To Answer the Door When Police Officers Knock?
Look, sooner or later, almost all of us will hear a knock at the door from a police officer. Maybe it’s a complaint from a neighbor, a neighborhood safety check, or just a curious officer.
Whatever the reason that there is an officer at your front door, the simple answer is no. No, you do not have to answer the door.
In fact, unless the officer has a warrant, or a very good reason to suspect there is a crime taking place, there is no reason for police officers to enter your home either.
And you are certainly allowed to ignore a police officer’s presence at your door.
Should You Answer the Door for Police Officers?
Whether you answer the door for a police officer, or not, is entirely up to you. As far as the law is concerned, it is not illegal for you to ignore police knocking at your door.
But, there may be circumstances when it is simply a better option to answer the door and see what the officer is knocking for. There. may be some circumstances in which talking to a police officer can stop things from escalating even further.
As Jeff Lewis Graduate ar Florida Coastal School of Law explains on Quora:
Also, bear in mind that it is not unreasonable to assume that the person at your door may just be dressed as a police officer. Anyone can get their hands on a police uniform and pretend to be an officer on duty.
In the end, it really depends on your individual circumstances. You have to decide what is right for you. But, if you do answer the door, you should also know you don’t have to, nor should you let the police in your home!
Your Home is Protected from Searches from Police
It’s true, the Supreme Court of the US has ruled time and time again that: your home should be protected from searches and the government to the fullest extent. And, it’s no secret that the 4th amendment protects us from unwarranted searches and seizures.
John Lee of University of Southern California had this to say on Quora:
However, opening the door and letting the police in your home can: open you up to an unwanted, and even unwarranted, search of your home.
There are also a few other specific reasons police may be allowed to search your home.
5 specific circumstances when police are allowed to search your home:
When You Consent to a Search– If you, or a roommate, do open the door for an officer and let them inside, it is quite easy for them to have you “consent” to a search. Remember: implied consent is still consent.
Warrant– This is the most commonly known method a police officer can use to enter your home.
Something is in Plain View- If the officer sees illegal activities, or items, from where he stands, he may “invite” himself inside.
After an Arrest– Immediately after an arrest, police officers can search for evidence or accomplices. If you are arrested at home, officers can search your home.
During an Emergency– If police officers are in pursuit of a suspect, or if there is an emergency, officers can search your home as part of their investigation.
Answering the Door for a Police Officer
In conclusion, you are absolutely within your rights to ignore an officer knocking on the door. Whether you do answer or not is up to you. But if you do open the door, remember that you do not have to let them inside, and you likely shouldn’t.
Whether the police are just doing a routine neighborhood safety inspection, showing up on a noise complaint, or investigating a crime, remember that you have rights. Most specifically, you have a right not to answer the door when police come knocking.
Though it is not something we often think about, it is important to research police interactions ahead of time.
Knowing how to act around, and with, police officers can save you a world of legal hassle, and may even save you your life. There is no simple answer when it comes to police interactions.
In the end, it is up to you to study so you can make an informed decision.
Here’s the deal, there are several laws which might be considered as the worlds oldest.
Some of the oldest laws existed before writing did. As such, the oldest written law in the world is a different law than the oldest law that ever existed.
Then of course, there are the first spoken laws.
Look, for the sake of being thorough, we are going to take a look at all three.
The First Existing Law, The First Written Law, and The First Spoken Law.
1. The First Existing Laws: Natural Law
Natural laws are those unchanging observable principles of life itself.
Natural laws have been in existence since the beginning of life itself, albeit, in an unwritten form. Surely these laws predate all forms of written law.
According to The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
The term “natural law” is ambiguous. It refers to a type of moral theory, as well as to a type of legal theory, but the core claims of the two kinds of theory are logically independent. –Source
An even more thorough definition of “Natural Law” can be found at: All About Philosophy.
Natural Law is a moral theory of jurisprudence, which maintains that law should be based on morality and ethics. Natural Law holds that the law is based on what’s “correct.” Natural Law is “discovered” by humans through the use of reason and choosing between good and evil. Therefore, Natural Law finds its power in discovering certain universal standards in morality and ethics. – Source
Though natural laws exist, they have to be discovered or observed to be known. Though natural laws are discovered through theory and observation, they are different from the “Laws of Nature”. Laws of Nature, such as gravity, etc. are based on purely scientific theory and principles, rather than morals and ethics.
John Sproule provides us this insight into natural law from his Quoraresponse to the question: “What is the oldest law in the world?”
As funny as John’s description of the oldest law is, it provides an excellent example of natural law.
Here are a few more examples of natural laws:
Killing Without Reason is Wrong
The Right to Be Heard in Court
The Right to Private Property
These laws may seem like common sense, and in many ways, natural laws are a sort of common sense. Depending on what you mean by the oldest law, natural laws are the oldest laws. Though these laws existed before writing and were not man-made.
2. The Oldest Written Law: The Ur-Nammu Codes
Now, what is the oldest written law? What is the first set of laws made and written by man?
Now, when most people talk about the first set of laws, they often point to the Hammurabi Babylon Codes, as this is what most of us were taught in school.
This is crazy, but the lesser known Code of Ur-Nammu (c. 2100–2050 BCE) predates Hammurabi’s Code (1754 BCE). From Mesopotamia, Ur-Nammu’s codes were written in Sumerian and are the oldest known written laws.
This code of laws was very similar to Hammurabi’s, and be warned, they were brutal. Here are a few of them:
If a man commits a murder, that man must be killed.
If a man commits a robbery, he will be killed.
If a man commits a kidnapping, he is to be imprisoned and pay 15 shekels of silver.
If a slave marries a slave, and that slave is set free, he does not leave the household.
If a slave marries a native (i.e. free) person, he/she is to hand the firstborn son over to his owner.
If a man violates the right of another and deflowers the virgin wife of a young man, they shall kill that male.
If the wife of a man followed after another man and he slept with her, they shall slay that woman, but that male shall be set free.
Arguably, the first spoken law, was the law God spoke to Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. A simple law given in Genesis 2:16 16-17 that most of us are familiar with:
16 The LORD God commanded the man, saying, “From any tree of the garden you may eat freely; 17 but from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat from it you will surely die.”
And, as we all know, that law was quickly broken. Of course, there are many more laws in the Bible as well which may be among the oldest. But the oldest of the old is certainly the law in Genesis.
So, what is the Oldest Law in the World?
As you can see from the above information, it really depends on what you mean by law. Natural laws have existed ever since life began. Yet, it took much longer to find their way to the minds of men, and then to paper.
The most obvious answer for the worlds oldest law is: the Ur-Nammu Codes. Which, although they were very similar to the Hammurabi Codes, predated them by hundreds of years
Finally, the first law in the world may also be: the law spoken to Adam and Eve to not eat from the Tree of Knowledge.
Depending on how you slice it, the oldest law in the world must be left somewhat up to the observer.
Look: working with a Public Defender may not be your first pick.
But, if you can’t afford a lawyer, what else can you do?
However, before you work with a Public Defender, there are a few things you should know.
Here’s the deal, from the first interactions with police officers, to the final court date.
This is your “go-to guide” for working with a Public Defender.
The Public Defender
You have probably heard rumors about how terrible Public Defenders are. You have likely even heard these lawyers referred to as “public pretenders”. Unfortunately,seeing the Public Defender in this light may only end up harming you.
Truly, many Public Defenders have made the active choice of being a Public Defender in order to serve those in need. They even take a pay cut for defending the public as well. With Public Defenders making thousands less a year than privately hired attorneys.
Even worse, Public Defenders get assigned more cases than private attorneys. This means they often have very little time to work on your case due to their heavy case load. It’s also true that Public Defenders or attorneys hired to defend those accused of crimes are often personally close to the prosecutor, and judge. This may seem like a conflict of interest.
But things don’t have to be as bad as they seem...
It’s no secret that Public Defenders are often loaded down with case work, and often don’t have the time to handle each individual case with the time it needs.
Many private lawyers have worked in public defense offices or directly as Public Defenders. Nearly any attorney will tell you: public defense work is no easy job.
WORST OF ALL: Public Defenders are often not trusted by their clients!
“Many who deal with them incorrectly assume that Public Defenders are some kind of second tier attorney bought and paid for by the State with no regard for their clients’ cases. This is simply not true, and if you think this way then you’re likely to be working AGAINST your Public Defender, instead of WITH them. Working against your Public Defender will almost assuredly hurt your case.” –Matthew S. Boomershine
The Best Practices for Working with a Public Defender
Look, in order to write this article: I reached out to several lawyers and attorneys with experience as Public Defenders. And I got some amazing responses.
There were a number of issues each one of them hit on.
Throughout this ultimate guide on working with Public Defenders- I will be sharing some of the great statements I received from lawyers, combined with some of the best information currently available.
There are a lot of downsides to working with a Public Defender, but, the good news is that most of the downsides to working with a Public Defender can be made better by you!
And this guide aims to show you how to work with a Public Defender in an effective manner.
Step 1- When Interacting with Officers:
Look, its easy to get heated when the cops get involved with something.
But, from the beginning of any interaction with a law enforcement officer, to being arrested and booked…
It is important not to discuss the case with anyone, except for your attorney. This can be hard when you want to get your emotions off your chest, but it is very important!
‘“Do not give statements to police; do not allow your children to give statements to police; do not consent to searches of anything, but do not resist arrest or obstruct an officer executing a search warrant.”
“This seems like a no-brainer, but in many cases the defendant’s own statement to police is the strongest evidence against him/her.“
“(A person) is obligated to give “booking information” e.g. name, address, date of birth, etc. there is no obligation that anyone, under any circumstances, give a statement about whatever it is that the police are investigating.” – Falen O. Cox
Don’t Consent to Searches and Seizures
You see, it is not only important to keep quiet, but you should also not consent to unwarranted searches and seizures. This can be challenging when faced with heavily armed officers, but you do have a right to not consent to searches which are not warranted.
In some cases, consenting to a search can be as simple as allowing the officer in your home. Refusing search and seizures takes tact. It is important to NEVER lose your temper, be patient, all the while firmly stating your refusal to consent to a search. This takes being informed about what police may and may not do and learning how to interact effectively with police.
This video does a very thorough job of explaining the topic of your rights during police interactions:
First, invoking your 5th amendment right and 6th amendment right to counsel should be done from the beginning of the booking process. This means you will not discuss the case without an attorney present. However, you are still required to provide booking information.
Attorney Cox says that:
“This (invoking the 6th amendment) is stronger than the Defendant’s own 5th Amendment right to silence.”
Once either or both rights are invoked defendants should no longer communicate with police, except for booking information.
“A defendant who has invoked the 5th or 6th amendment who later initiates conversation with law enforcement has waived that prior invocation (e.g. defendant says he wants a lawyer, the police leave the room then return to tell him he’s being arrested, and then the defendant says something to the effect of “I didn’t even do this, why are you all arresting me, I wasn’t there, let me tell you what happened…).” – Falen O. Cox
Although a public defender is assigned to help a defendant in a criminal case, the defendant can also take actions to help their lawyer.(7)
Now it’s time to wait for your attorney, and if you are reading this, you are likely looking at working with a Public Defender. Once your right to counsel has been invoked, do not discuss the case with anyone but your attorney.
Step 3: Working with Your Public Defender
Now that you are finally working with your Public Defender, here is what you need to know!
Public Defenders have really gotten a bad rap, but just like a private attorney, Public Defenders are legally required to serve your best interests. They are required to keep the details of your case private.
Additionally, most Public Defenders genuinely care about defending the public, but they often receive little or no cooperation from their clients. This is a huge hitch when it comes to their ability to defend you.
Trust Your Public Defender
According to a few attorneys I spoke with, trust is a must when it comes to working with your Public Defender. The lack of trust currently present between Public Defenders and their defendants is a huge, crippling hurdle many Public Defenders face with their clients.
Matthew S. Boomershine, the criminal defense attorney with Bogin, Munns, and Munns, had this advice on trusting your public defender, and taking their advice:
“Cooperate with your Public Defender and trust them. If your Public Defender asks you to sign a document or handle something a particular way, LISTEN TO THEM and COOPERATE. They are there to help you, and often times they are your last line of defense against prosecutors, Judges, and a justice system in general that won’t lose any sleep over locking you up.”
“Individuals end up derailing their own cases by thinking that they know better than their Public Defender. Deviating from your lawyer’s advice is almost NEVER a good idea. Trust that they will help you, and follow their instructions. Don’t trust a guy-who-knows-a-guy that got a better deal or who got off of his charges over your own lawyers advice.”
“These types of stories are almost never accurate, and you’re better off trusting a trained lawyer who knows your case, knows the prosecutor, knows the law, and knows the Judge, than some guy-who-knows-a-guy. Your case, and your life, will be better for it.” – Matthew S. Boomershine
It’s true, trusting your Public Defender is a crucial element in helping your attorney defend you.
Cooperate with Your Public Defender and the Courts
The lawyers that I spoke with really honed in on the importance of cooperating with your lawyer. Though trusting your attorney is a crucial first step, cooperation is just as key.
All of the attorneys mentioned different methods for cooperation.
“Whether it’s for a meeting or hearing, the defendant should always arrive early. This gives you time to review your case and details with the public defender. The attorney will likely have a few minutes before your hearing to consult, so show up 20-30 minutes early.” –Samuel J. Randall IV
2. Read court mail
“Your public defender will not likely have time to remind you of every hearing and deadline. You should read all mail you get from the court or your attorney and make sure you discuss anything in advance.” –Samuel J. Randall IV
3. Follow up
“If you call or email your attorney, give them a few days and then follow up. Unfortunately, it’s easy to fall between the cracks of a public defender’s schedule. Let them know you have questions that need to be answered.” –Samuel J. Randall IV
4. Collect information
Your case may be complex, and the public defender has little time for an investigation. They will likely do their best, but you can help by bringing any information that you feel is relevant as well. If you have recordings, pictures, letters, or other information, bring it to the attention of your attorney.” –Samuel J. Randall IV
Those are certainly four great ways in which you can cooperate with your Public Defender. When you arrive early- you have time to talk with your Public Defender and establish a plan of action.
Reading court mail (as stressful as it may be), helps you cooperate by showing up on the right days. Locke’s point about following up is important as well.
“A public defender’s job is tough because they have too many cases and not enough time. Anything that helps the public defender have the information she needs will help her prepare the best case.” –Ryan C. Locke
I know, I know, it has been said a million times in this article, but the more time you can save your public attorney, the more time he can spend defending you!
Attorney Randall also tells us:
“Send the public defender information to use in a bond argument, or potential witnesses, or the existence of helpful evidence, or a list of witnesses to present at sentencing and what each one can talk about.” –Samuel J. Randall IV
Communicating with Your Public Defender
Another point that a few attorneys touched on was that: Public Defenders not only have to keep up with their clients themselves, but they also have to help defendants stay in touch with the outside world if their client is in jail.
As you can imagine, a Public Defender with 10 clients in jail would have A LOT of family members and friends to keep up to date. This isn’t exclusive to Public Defenders; the main complaint about attorneys is that they are bad at communicating.
Ryan C. Locke of Locke Law Firm explains:
“…find out how your public defender prefers to communicate and then do that. The biggest complaint about lawyers in general is that they’re bad at communicating with their clients. For public defender it’s especially difficult because of the number of clients they represent and because they’re usually in court for most of the day.”
“When I was a public defender, I used to call my clients back on Saturday mornings because I didn’t have time during the day to take anything but urgent calls. Other public defenders prefer to email or text. Find out what works best with your public defender and then do that.” -Ryan C. Locke
It gets better…
There are some other methods which can help you save your Public Defender time on their case. Falen O. Cox, of Cox, Rodman & Middleton had this piece of advice on saving your Public Defenders time…
“Nominate 1 person in your family to communicate with the public defender. Everyone knows that public defenders, and all other lawyers, have multiple clients. While most do not mind updating family members about the status of your case, relaying the same information to multiple people is time consuming and can lead to confusion.”
Now, I know that we have covered a lot so far, and you are working your way though this article quickly. But, this is THE ultimate guide for working with your Public Defender, so we must leave no stone unturned.
Matthew S. Boomershine, with Bogin, Munns, and Munns had a few important points to make about how to handle communication issues with your Public Defender.
“Stay in constant communication with your Public Defender and their office. One of the biggest problems Public Defenders face is a lack of communication with their clients. … Communication between a lawyer and their client is a cornerstone of competent legal representation, and it is virtually impossible for any attorney to provide effective representation without regular communication.”
“Be sure your Public Defender knows how to get a hold of you. Call their office early on in your case, and be sure they have the correct address, phone number, and email address for you in their file.”
“Call the office regularly to inquire about the status of the case. If you’re having difficulty reaching the attorney assigned to your case or getting any helpful information about the case, ask to schedule a meeting at their office, in person, to discuss your case.”
“If that’s not possible, ask for a scheduled telephone call with the attorney.” -Matthew S. Boomershine, Bogin, Munns, and Munns
Boomershine made a lot of good points about communicating with your Public Defender, and how to address possible issues in communication which may occur. He also stresses the importance of communicating your case before arriving at court.
“If you have a meeting or a scheduled call with your Public Defender – make sure you are there as scheduled and on time for the appointment. Don’t wait until your Court date to speak with your Public Defender or meet with them.”
“Often, these scheduled Court dates will involve hundreds of cases scheduled to be heard at the same time, and Public Defenders will not have extra time to sit down with you in Court and discuss your case.”
“Even if they could make time, talking about your case with your lawyer in a public courtroom, in front of your Judge and the assigned prosecutor, is never a good idea. Most courtrooms are recorded, and anything you say in there could potentially be used against you later by the State.” -Matthew S. Boomershine, Bogin, Munns, and Munns
Collaborating with Your Public Defender
Many individuals may want to help their Public Defender. And in fact, it may be a good idea to do so, due to the limited amount of time which Public Defenders can spend on your case. Learning the law may be helpful, but it may also put you in the way of your attorneys work.
Falen O. Cox had some great points to make on this subject saying:
“The client is the expert on the facts and the lawyer is the expert on the law.”
“While most good public defenders will welcome collaboration with the client about his or her case, a better use of the client’s time is making sure that the lawyer knows all relevant facts, letting the lawyer know who might speak for him or her, and helping the lawyer to tell his or her story.” –Falen O. Cox
That being said, the most important thing you can do to help your Public Defender is to help him gather as much facts and evidence as possible. This starts with being honest, and trusting that your attorney must keep your conversations confidential.
Matthew S. Boomershine, with Bogin, Munns, and Munns made these points about helping your Public Defender build your case.
“Be involved in your case. Ask your Public Defender for copies of all discovery materials received in your case. When you receive these – read them. Take notes on them. Go through everything. Look for anything that you think may be incorrect or incomplete about your story.”
“Write it all down, and send it to your Public Defender for them to review. Some of what you notice may not be significant for your case, but some of it may be. Ask for a meeting with your Public Defender BEFORE your scheduled Court dates to discuss your notes on the discovery materials.”
“Also, Keep your own folder and file of all documents related to your case so that you can stay organized and keep track of everything for yourself.” –Matthew S. Boomershine
In-between now and your case, you need to recall as much information as you can. The more information you can provide your Public Defender, the better he or she can defend you. Boomershine goes into detail about the information you can prepare to make the most of meetings with your lawyer.
“Make the most of your time with the Public Defender. Understand that even the best of Public Defenders will have limited time to give each of their clients. Make the most of it. When you know you’ll be speaking with your Public Defender or meeting with them in person, come prepared. Bring with you any and all documents relevant to your case.”
“If you have evidence in your possession that you think will help your case (such as text messages, photographs, emails, etc.), print out copies of those items for your Public Defender to keep and bring them with you. Be prepared with the full legal names and contact information (address, phone, email) of any and all witnesses you feel are necessary for them to speak with about your case.”
“If possible, bring those witnesses with you to your scheduled meeting so the Public Defender can meet them and speak with them. When you meet with your Public Defender or speak with them about your case, take detailed notes and keep those notes in your own file or folder for later reference.” –Matthew S. Boomershine
Keeping Your Court Dates and Progress
Look, there are still a few more things you need to keep in mind when working with your Public Defender. I know that it is a lot of work, but your freedom and livelihood may be on the line. So, I want to add a few more points about following the progress of your case.
It is your responsibility to show up to court dates and meetings on time. No Public Defender has the time to consistently keep track of you and remind you of your cases. Again, the more time you can save your Public Defender, the better they can serve you.
Matthew Boomershine had these final remarks to make:
“Know your own Court dates, and be present and on time for each and every one when required. Don’t rely on the Public Defender to handle your Court dates for you. Stay on top of your case’s progress, and know when you are required to be in Court.“
“If you don’t know, call the Clerk of Court in the County where your case is being handled – they can advise of your scheduled Court dates right over the telephone. When you speak with the Clerk, be sure to ask them to update your current address in their system – this way the Clerk will be able to mail your Court notices to the right address to ensure you’re getting them as the case progresses.”
Also, many jurisdictions now allow the public to track criminal cases online – ask your Clerk if they offer an online system to track the progress of your case. If they do, locate that online system and learn to use it – there you will be able to find information about documents filed in your case and also be able to keep track of all scheduled Court dates.”
“Most of these online systems are free and do not require any kind of registration or account setup. Many local public libraries now offer internet service for free – if you don’t have access to the internet, find a local library to visit regularly and keep track of your case.” –Matthew S. Boomershine
What’s the Bottom Line?
As you can see there truly is A LOT you can do to make the most out of working with a Public Defender. A lot of this is on you.
It’s a lot of work to be sure, but rest assured that Public Defenders are professional attorneys. They are sworn by law to defend you.
It may seem like an odd thought at first, but have you ever considered what the effects of sitting in the AC all day may be on your heart?
To be honest, I never really had.
In fact, I haven’t used an AC in years, but last night, I put one in my office, which is upstairs.
In fact, it’s the hottest room in the house, and it can be difficult to get work done in a blazing hot office. After sitting in the AC all day for the first time in years, I noticed that I felt a little groggy in the afternoon.
Much more than usual. I assume my blood pressure was high, but I didn’t measure it. Yet, I hadn’t changed anything in my routine. Except that I sat in the AC all day.
After realizing this, I looked into the science. And there is actually a bit of science which shows that colder temperatures, and possibly even air conditioning, are likely responsible for higher blood pressure, and even heart attacks.
Study 1: Air temperature is an external trigger for heart attacks
One study, which took place over 16 years and evaluated over 280,000 patients, found that:
“The average number of heart attacks per day was significantly higher during seasons with colder outdoor temperatures as compared to warmer.” –Source
This wasn’t the only study which found a similar comparison.
Study 2: Temperature Drops Put the Squeeze on Heart Attack Risk
A second study published in the British Medical Journal found that:
“Researchers behind the new work assessed four years of hospital admissions from 15 sites across the U.K. and found that a drop in the mean daily temperature of as little as 1 degree Celsius increased the number of heart attacks for the proceeding four weeks.” – Source
So, what about air conditioned atmospheres? Common sense says of course it would have the same effect indoors as it does out doors, but what do the studies say?
Study 3: Air-conditioning and health:
Effect on pulse and blood pressure of young healthy Nigerians.
The idea of the effects of air conditioning on blood pressure are nothing new.
A study from 1990 showed that there was a correlation between a higher blood pressure when the AC was on vs. when the people in the study where in a room with no AC. Though, the study says they felt these differences were not of clinical significance. Here were the results:
“The mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 115.3 +/- 11.5 mmHg under air-conditioner (AC) and 108.5 +/- 10.1 mmHg without air-conditioning.” –Source
What’s the Bottom Line?
There are not currently a lot of studies on air-conditioning’s direct effects on heart health. On the other hand, there are several studies which show that colder outdoor weather raises heart attack risk, as compared to warmer months.
Of course, overexertion, and overheating can have problems of their own too. But, there appears to be less risk of heart disease in warmer weather than cooler. Likely in large part due to constricted blood vessels.
It’s true that it is important to cool down at parts of the day in warmer months, but too much cooling may just be worse for your bodily well being than is commonly thought.
If the scientific community truly respected the scientific method as much as they claim to, they would respect those who have disbelief in ideas, for which, they possess no first hand experience.
It’s very ironic that those who taught science, overall, have no respect for the core principles upon which the scientific community rests.
This is specifically troublesome as much of the scientific community and the main stream media merge into a coalition which is most unscientific. It is truly a conspiracy against those that wish to see the empirical evidence upon which the claims of the scientific community stand. A conspiracy who shields their malpractices under the supposed authority of their privileged position.
As laid out previously, the scientific community should rely on using the scientific methods by which they make their discoveries with, to explain their findings to the public; rather than using governmental authority and the media to force their findings on the public.
Today, I am diving deeper into this argument, and looking at a few specific cases in which this type of pseudo-science is occurring. And furthermore putting forth the argument that the scientific community is forming, or has formed, a conspiracy built on pseudo-scientific ideologies. Not only in order to censor dissenting scientific opinions, but also to form governments and governmental organizations, some global some localized.
Perhaps it is a side effect of the collapse of traditional information dissemination methods which were undermined by the internet. Whatever the case, the scientific community no longer relies on sharing valid science, or demonstrations of scientific proof. Instead they claim sciences to be “settled”. But settled science is a misnomer, science is never settled.
Scientific censorship begins in the ways in which the studies are conducted, and how funding is received. With funding only being granted to “approved” research topics, and shame being granted to scientists that go against the “norm”. However, that is a different topic entirely and, for the sake of time, I will leave it at that.
My main concern is the “urgency” with which main stream scientific opinions are forced into the broader public.
Rather than taking the time tested approaches of education, and battling in the free market of ideas, modern scientific opinions co-opt the mainstream media, and even the government, to ensure their “science” is accepted.
There are two methods I will cover in this writing by which the scientific community and the political sector have compacted a conspiracy to control discussion and therefore “progress”.
One can be seen with the way in which social media giants are treating vaccine information. Rather than proving safety of vaccines through empirical science, or even pointing to research, they simply use political power, and public shaming to censor vaccine information.
First by pretending that all opinions which even moderately question vaccine safety are “misinformation” or “fake news“. Second by publicly shaming social media networks and their users. Networks like: Pinterest, Twitter, and Facebook have begun throttling results which yield approved information, or out right banning opposition. When they can’t win in the free market, they just change the rules.
A second method, and perhaps a much more dangerous one, can be seen in the climate change discussion. Most obviously, we can look at how some are attempting to create a global government through using political power to establish a global carbon tax.
One attempt at this global carbon tax was the Paris Climate Agreement. This agreement not only required the US to cut emissions, but also to pay a massive tax to a global coalition. This one sided deal gave other nations, like China and India, a decade’s head start, and punished the US. Regardless of how one-sided the deal was, it was brought forth in response: the pseudo-scientific idea of the “settled science” of climate change.
Cui bono? Who benefits from this global tax?
Funny you should ask, for any government to exist, it needs money. To the European Union, it was a Value Added Tax on all goods traded between EU nations. Some seeking extreme political power are attempting to use a global tax on carbon emissions to form a new global government. All under the veil of “doing the right thing” while imposing us with a global government based on the misuse of science.
Regardless of the cause of climate change, simply put, science must remain scientific. Valuing empirical evidence over power and prestige. More importantly, understanding the public’s desire to see proof of science through first hand experience, and not at the point of a gun.
When force is used, force is returned. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. And this entire proposal is the beginning of actions brought forth by the rise of pseudoscience.
If you want to convince people of a scientific theory or idea, use the scientific method.
While searching through an old dictionary from 1778, I found a peculiar thing.
There is not a distinct “J” section, for words beginning with the letter J.
In fact, there were very few words which begin with J that appeared in the dictionary. So few were the J words that they were mixed in with the section for “I” words.
That ‘s right, I’s and J’s were in the same section.
The History of the Letter J
The reason that there is no distinct I and J section in the dictionary from 1778 is due to the fact that: the letter J was, and still is, a relatively new letter.
I’s and J’s were used interchangeably until 1524, when the “Father of the letter J“, Gian Giorgio Trissino, made the distinction between the the sounds the two letters made.
Trissino made the distinction from the Greek word “Iesus”, a translation of the Hebrew word “Yeshua”. He “found” that the proper spelling should be Jesus, as we now hear it in modern English. Jesus, as it is now pronounced, was the phoneme which we now pass the J sound we have today.
Since that time, the letter J has grown in usage, and now there are 1000’s of words which begin with the new letter.
Even 150 years after the letter J was “discovered”, words which began with J still had not earned their own position in dictionaries.
Despite the current popularity of the letter J, and in particular the name Jesus, the poplar J, as in Jam, sound did not exist in either Greek, Latin or Hebrew.
Additionally, Greek and Latin languages lacked the “Y” sound, so they replaced it with I. The name became further diluted when translated into English when the letter was replaced with the J.
This occurred in large part because- Greek and Latin relied on 4th century translations of the sacred texts, and Hebrew at the time was nearly a forgotten language. Because of this, they did not have access to the Y sound created by the Hebrew letter Yod/Yud.
In Hebrew however, the name of the savior is more properly pronounced “Yeshua” or “Yahusha”. A translation lost in the King James Version of the Bible, which popularized the modern name.